Schindelin et al. (2012)
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9:676–682. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019
View on DOI
Cell counting is one of the most fundamental tasks in any biology lab. Whether you're passaging cells, setting up assays, or analysing drug responses, you need to know how many cells you have and how healthy they are. The methods have evolved from manual haemocytometers to sophisticated AI-powered microscopy systems.
In this guide, we explore the full spectrum of cell counting technologies: from classic watershed algorithms in ImageJ, through modern deep learning approaches like CellSAM and Cellpose-SAM, to fully integrated systems like the EVOS M5000 that count cells and measure confluence automatically with a single tap. The EVOS M3000 is an imaging-only microscope and does not count cells.
Not sure whether you need a benchtop counter or a microscope that counts cells? A standalone counter is fast and compact, but an integrated imaging system also captures publication-quality images, measures confluence and supports fluorescence workflows.
| Feature | Standalone Counter (e.g. Countess 3, LUNA-II) | Cell-Counting Microscope (e.g. EVOS M5000, M7000) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary output | Cell count / viability | Images + count + confluence |
| Fluorescence imaging | Limited or none | Multi-channel |
| Confluence tracking | Usually no | Built-in |
| Best for | High-throughput suspension counts | Cell culture labs needing images |
Related: compare the best automated cell counting microscopes for UK labs, including EVOS, Countess and LUNA systems.
For decades, the go-to method for automated cell counting in microscopy has been the watershed algorithm. Watershed segmentation treats fluorescence intensity as "elevation" — bright cells are peaks, dark background is valleys. The algorithm "floods" the image from local minima and places boundaries where different flooding regions meet.
The Find Maxima and Watershed tools in ImageJ/Fiji have been the workhorse for academic labs. The built-in Cell Counter plugin allows semi-automated counting with manual verification, while the TrackMate plugin extends this to time-lapse sequences.
For automated workflows, the Analyze Particles function combined with Binary → Watershed can segment touching cells. However, this requires careful parameter tuning for each cell type — what works for HEK293 cells may fail completely with primary neurons or tissue sections.
Limitations: Watershed struggles with densely packed cells, irregular morphologies, and overlapping nuclei. It also requires consistent staining and imaging conditions — real-world lab variability often breaks the algorithm.
Get it: ImageJ/Fiji (Free Download) — Cell Counter Plugin — Watershed Guide
Modern deep learning approaches have transformed cell counting from a parameter-tuning nightmare into a robust, generalisable workflow. These models learn features directly from training data rather than relying on handcrafted rules.
Cellpose (Stringer et al., 2021) was a breakthrough — a generalist algorithm that segments cells "out-of-the-box" across diverse microscopy images without manual parameter tuning. The latest iteration, Cellpose 3.0, adds one-click image restoration (denoising and deblurring) to improve segmentation quality on degraded images.
Cellpose-SAM combines Cellpose with Meta AI's Segment Anything Model (SAM) for segmentation that exceeds inter-human annotation agreement in quality.
Published in Nature Methods (December 2025), CellSAM represents the next generation of foundation models for biological imaging. Unlike task-specific models, foundation models are trained on massive, diverse datasets and can be adapted to new tasks with minimal fine-tuning.
Publication: Marks et al., "CellSAM: a foundation model for cell segmentation", Nature Methods, 2025. Read Paper →
Get it: CellSAM GitHub (Free)
μSAM (micro-SAM) builds on Meta AI's Segment Anything Model (SAM) — a general-purpose image segmentation model released in 2023. μSAM specialises SAM for microscopy and biomedical imaging through fine-tuning on cellular datasets.
Publication: "Segment Anything for Microscopy", Nature Methods, 2024. Read Paper → — Get μSAM (Free)
SAMCell (2025) demonstrates that SAM can segment cells even without fluorescent labels — using only brightfield or phase contrast images. This opens cell counting to label-free workflows where staining is impossible or undesirable.
Publication: "SAMCell: Generalized label-free biological cell segmentation with segment anything", PLOS One, 2025. Read Paper →
While open-source AI tools offer incredible flexibility, many UK labs need turnkey solutions that work out-of-the-box without Python scripting or GPU setup. The EVOS M5000 Imaging System integrates automated cell counting and confluence analysis directly into the microscope. The EVOS M3000 is imaging-only and does not count cells.
For busy cell culture facilities, the workflow integration is as important as the algorithm. The EVOS M5000:
A typical UK research lab running 50 cell culture flasks per week might spend 5–10 hours on manual counting using a haemocytometer. With automated EVOS counting, this drops to under 30 minutes — freeing researchers for actual science while improving reproducibility.
Automated confluence detection is equally transformative. Instead of subjective "70% confluent" estimates that vary between technicians, the EVOS reports exact percentages — enabling precise passaging schedules and consistent experimental timing.
| Method | Best For | Expertise | Tier | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual Haemocytometer | Quick checks, teaching labs | None | Entry-level | Variable (±20%) |
| ImageJ Watershed | Research labs with standard cell lines | Moderate | Free | Good (±10%) |
| Cellpose 3.0 | Diverse cell types, custom workflows | Moderate | Free (GPU needed) | Excellent (±5%) |
| CellSAM | Novel cell types, minimal annotation | Advanced | Free (GPU needed) | Superhuman |
| μSAM | Interactive segmentation, 3D data | Moderate | Free (GPU needed) | Excellent |
| EVOS M5000 | Busy labs, standardisation, compliance | None | Mid-range | Excellent (±5%) |
Stamped counting (2025) uses a novel approach where cells are "stamped" onto a regular grid for density estimation — ideal for extremely dense cultures where individual segmentation fails. Published in Methods in Microbiology, 2025.
DLA-Count (2025) addresses dense cell distributions where overlapping nuclei make traditional methods fail. Uses dynamic label assignment networks to resolve touching cells. arXiv Paper →
DeepCellCount (2025) combines detection and regression in a two-step pipeline — first localising cells, then estimating counts. Particularly effective for heterogeneous populations. Read Paper →
Cell counting has evolved from manual counting chambers → classical algorithms → deep learning → integrated hardware. The best choice depends on your lab's needs:
The trend is clear: AI is making cell counting more accurate, more generalisable, and more accessible. Whether you choose open-source tools or integrated systems, manual counting is increasingly replaced by reproducible automated workflows.
Once you know which counting workflow fits your lab, the next step is choosing the hardware. These Plankton & Zoom guides compare UK-available systems without pricing or dealer language:
Related: compare the best automated cell counting microscopes for UK labs, including EVOS, Countess and LUNA systems with tiers.
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9:676–682. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019
View on DOIilastik: interactive machine learning for image segmentation. Nature Methods 16:1226–1232. doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0582-9
View on DOInucleAI: deep learning-based nuclei segmentation in histopathology images. Nature Communications 13:5942. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33624-3
View on DOIEVOS systems include automated object detection and confluence algorithms; exported images can also be analysed with AI/ML tools.
Machine learning models segment cells from background and report percentage coverage, even for irregular morphologies.
Modern AI models separate touching cells better than traditional thresholding, improving accuracy in dense cultures.
Yes, AI models reduce inter-operator variation and give consistent counts across experiments.
Export EVOS TIFFs and process them in Python, CellProfiler, QuPath or cloud ML pipelines.